Quantcast
Channel: SB Nation - New York Yankees
Viewing all 4714 articles
Browse latest View live

What can the Yankees expect from 39-year old Hiroki Kuroda?

$
0
0

Hiroki Kuroda pitched very well in 2013 as a 38-year old, anchoring the staff through CC Sabathia's unexpected troubles. Kuroda comes back for another year, but how much can really be expected in 2014?

Lost amid the signings of Jacoby Ellsbury and Carlos Beltran as well as losing Robinson Cano to the Seattle Mariners, the Yankees retained one of the few bright spots in 2013 by re-signing Hiroki Kuroda. As Jeff Sullivan pointed out, Kuroda pitched better last year than all of the other available free agent starters, and the Yankees only had to guarantee one year for his services. The move did not draw much attention, but that will happen when it was expected and coincided with the team losing its franchise player.

Despite pitching very well in 2013, the signing was not without risks. Kuroda faded badly down the stretch, and some questions arose whether Kuroda might be finished. Chris Mitchell took a look at some of Kuroda's peripheral stats and concluded the problems were likely the result of bad luck and not poor pitching. Our friends over at Beyond the Box Score investigated the numbers and reached the same results. While Kuroda's poor home stretch may have been a result of bad luck, age catches up to all players and a decrease in performance is expected over time.

Kuroda is far from the only pitcher to pitch effectively into his late 30s so perhaps examining those players may be instructive in predicting what the Yankees will receive during the 2014 season. Between 2011-2013, Kuroda's age 36-38 seasons, Kuroda put together a bWAR of 12.7 over 623 innings pitched. Using the play-index feature at baseball-reference.com, I searched for a group of pitchers over the last 50 years with at least ten bWAR over their age 36-38 seasons and 500-700 innings pitched. The search resulted in around a dozen players, but to ensure the players were similar, I removed pitchers who did not pitch well in their age 38 seasons. Between bWAR and fWAR, Kuroda averaged 3.95 WAR last season. I removed any player that was not above an average WAR of 3.0.

Unfortunately, narrowing the list of players left only four pitchers. Four is not enough to draw great conclusions, but it does provide a greater appreciation for Kuroda's efforts over the last several years. The four similar pitchers are Roger Clemens, Rick Reuschel, Geoff Zahn, and Tom Glavine. The four pitchers averaged 11.5 bWAR over their age 36-38 seasons, including an average bWAR and fWAR of 4.2 during their age 38 season. In their age 39 season, the quartet held on fairly well, averaging 2.8 WAR. Only Geoff Zahn did not pitch well, making only seven starts before a shoulder injury and subsequent surgery ended his career. Clemens (pitching for the Yankees), Reuschel, and Glavine all had seasons at 3.5 WAR or above which bodes well for Kuroda's prospects next year.

Interestingly, both Reuschel and Glavine faded down the stretch in their age 38 seasons like Kuroda, but both were able to rebound the following season and pitch well. Yankees General Manager Brian Cashman stated before the off-season started that he was looking to add 400 innings to the rotation. His goal is halfway completed. With a rebound from CC Sabathia, continued development from Ivan Nova, and another solid season from Kuroda, the Yankees rotation could again prove to be a strength next season.


Yankees reluctant to go four years for Omar Infante

$
0
0

Where have we seen this script before?

The Yankees have been in talks with second baseman Omar Infante, given their vacancy at second base. Infante's probably the best second baseman on the market now that Robinson Cano is all but locked up in Seattle, and it's obvious that he knows it. The 32-year-old wants a four-year deal worth about $8 million per season, and the Yankees don't want to give him that fourth year:

The Royals appear to be the chief competitor for Infante's services, and if they want to give him that fourth year, they can go right ahead. While Infante had a good year in 2013 with a 117 wRC+ in 118 games (he missed a month and a half with a sprained ankle), he had a wRC+ hovering around 90 from 2011-12 with the Marlins and Tigers. He's been a good defensive second baseman in the past, but he was only okay last year. He would give the Yankees another righthanded hitter, but who knows if he can even approach his 2013 numbers again?

If the Yankees can get Infante for three years and $24-26 million, that wouldn't be too bad. In the worst-case scenario, his bat disappears again and he becomes a utility infielder, which was his role for most of his first decade in the pros. Four years kind of scares of me though; at that point, just sign Mark Ellis for a one or two-year deal. Ellis will turn 37 next June, but he put up roughly equal overall production to Infante last year thanks to far superior defense and he won't cost nearly as much. Frankly, I would not be heartbroken if they just gave a short deal to Ellis and declined to even offer Infante three years. He's just not a very inspiring player (neither is Ellis, but hey, shorter contract).

Then again, we've already seen the Yankees acquiesce to Carlos Beltran's request for a third year this off-season in addition to giving Jacoby Ellsbury a contract longer than the one the Red Sox were prepared to offer. Will they again bow down to a free agent's desire for more years or hold their ground? I know which side Greg Kirkland will take.

Poll
Who should be the Yankees' second baseman in 2014?

  231 votes |Results

Dellin Betances has a fourth option and can be sent to the minors in 2014

$
0
0

Dellin Betances was moved to the bullpen in 2013 after seasons of struggling to find his way in the rotation at the Triple-A level. The Yankees obviously felt like Betances' best shot at sticking with the team long-term came from a move to the bullpen to try and minimize his struggles. The team was running out of options on Betances and was in danger of losing him if he wasn't able to stick on the major league roster.

Brian Cashman announced today, much to the surprise of most, that Betances has a fourth option and can be sent to the minors for one more season. This fourth option stems from a rare rule that allows a player that has five or fewer professional seasons who has already used up three options to have one additional option year.

This means that Betances doesn't necessarily have to stick with the Yankees out of spring training this year, which is very different from want was believed before today's revelation. The Yankees can send him back to Triple-A to continue to work in relief, or even possibly give his chances at the rotation one more go. Considering how well he did in relief with the RailRiders last season, it seems pretty ridiculous to try and move him back to the rotation. Relievers are less valuable than starters, but a strong reliever is much more valuable than a starting pitcher who walks the park and has little idea where the ball is headed.

If Betances is not in the bullpen as the long reliever to start the 2014 season, the job could fall to Adam Warren for a second season. Warren could also make some noise in the battle for the fifth starter position with David Phelps, Michael Pineda, and Vidal Nuno. Those who miss out on the rotation spot will likely be split between heading back to Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre and working out of the big league bullpen.

Mets, Bartolo Colon agree to 2-year deal

$
0
0

Sandy Alderson bolsters his starting rotation with a surprising move.

The New York Mets and free agent starting pitcher Bartolo Colon have agreed to a two-year, $20 million contract, FOX Sports' Ken Rosenthal reports. Pending a physical, this will be Mets GM Sandy Alderson's third notable signing of the offseason.

After signing Curtis Granderson two a four-year, $60M contract last week, the Mets have been fairly quiet. While trade rumors have been swirling around infielders Daniel Murphy and Ike Davis, Alderson had yet to make a move since last Thursday.

With their ace in Matt Harvey undergoing Tommy John surgery earlier in the offseason, the Metropolitans are in need of pitching help. In 2013 with the Oakland Atheltics, Colon went 18-6 with a 2.65 ERA, 190.1 IP, 117 strikeouts and three shutouts. Even at age 41, Colon can be an effective veteran starter while bridging the gap for the Mets until Harvey gets healthy and their young pitching prospects blossom.

Colon also drew interest from the Athletics, Twins, Orioles, Rangers, Mariners and Indians before signing with the Mets. Oakland worked on re-signing him for the first couple of weeks of the offseason before settling on left-hander Scott Kazmir to fill out their rotation.

WFAN's Sweeney Murti was the first to report that a deal with Colon was in the works.

MLB News: Home plate collisions banned, some instant replay challenge rules clarified

$
0
0

The game finally enters the 21st century.

Today, the MLB Rules Committee led by Joe Torre and Sandy Alderson announced a sweeping change planned for the 2014 season: ugly home plate collisions will be officially a thing of the past:

Craig Calcaterra at Hardball Talk notes that the players must approve it for the rule to go into effect for the 2014 season; otherwise, MLB will have to wait until 2015 to implement it. However, the players are expected to fully approve of the change.

Given how many concussions have resulted from home plate collisions, I am 100% behind this rule. For as exciting a finish as home plate collisions could occasionally be, like J.T. Snow vs. Ivan Rodriguez in the last play of the 2003 NLDS, it is simply not worth it to have to stomach the collisions that end like Buster Posey's did in the early goings of 2011. Modern medical studies have taught us far more about concussions than we ever knew before, and baserunners' assaults on home plate with catchers blocking can lead to concussions so easily.

Catchers have to go through enough hardships just from foul balls off the mask and rogue swings hitting the helmet. Playing careers like Mike Matheny's and Jorge Posada's ended in large part due to concussions. By eliminating home plate collisions, MLB takes a step toward decreasing the frequency of concussions in the game. It's not like barreling into a fielder at other bases has ever been considered acceptable at any position other then catcher. Catcher equipment can only do so much to protect them. As Tanya pointed out on Twitter, it's so much easier to sit at home on your couch and bemoan the loss of home plate collisions when you're not the one risking brain damage from enormous men trying to demolish you. It's just not worth the risk, and sliding plays into home plate can be just as exciting (Don't believe me? Watch the end of the 1992 NLCS and 2007 NL Wild Card game). Baseball simply does not need home plate collisions.

On an instant replay note, Torre also clarified some of the planned new rules about instant replay. Managers will be allowed to use up to two replay challenges during the first seven innings. If he is correct in his challenge, he will receive one more. It would seem that the managers will get two challenges per full game regardless. While I would prefer a system in which a sixth umpire or someone like that simply reviews all close plays without the hassle of throwing flags, losing challenges, or whatever, this is still a better system than those of years past with no replay outside of borderline homers. It could be better, but it's a start, at least. Although the MLB Players Association and the Umpires Association still have to sign off on replay, it looks like all but a lock to be ready for the start of the 2014 season.

Poll
Is it good for MLB to eliminate home plate collisions?

  51 votes |Results

Yankees trade rumors: Reds interested in acquiring Brett Gardner

$
0
0

Yankees GM Brian Cashman said earlier today that he hadn't picked up the phone to offer Brett Gardner in any trades despite the crowded outfield situation, however, he confirmed that he had been receiving calls from other teams. According to Joel Sherman of the New York Post, the Cincinnati Reds are interested in Gardner to fill their outfield needs.

Gardner was linked to the Reds earlier this week with the Yankees on the hunt for a starting pitcher. Multiple members of the media suggested that the Reds could trade Homer Bailey for Gardner in a swap of impending free agents. Reds GM Walt Jocketty has since said that he doesn't plan to trade Bailey this offseason. Plans can change in a hurry once talks heat up, but that's at least the storyline for now. Each side would be dealing from a position of strength in swapping Gardner and Bailey, which usually bodes well if both sides are willing to get something done.

Sherman notes that the Yankees do not like reliever Sean Marshall. Marshall only pitched 10.1 innings in 2013 due to shoulder tendinitis, but the left-hander saved nine games with a 2.51 ERA in 61 innings in 2012. The Yankees could use some help in their bullpen next season, but it's unlikely that they would be willing to part with Gardner to get it. Second base, third base, and the rotation remain more pressing concerns.

Reds second baseman Brandon Phillips has also been the subject of trade rumors this offseason. Cincinnati could be looking to shed his contract before 2014, possibly providing a match for the Yankees to fill the vacancy left by Robinson Cano's departure. It seems like there are multiple ways that these two teams could match up for a deal, even if it includes more pieces than just Gardner.

Why the Red Sox should re-sign Stephen Drew

$
0
0

When weighing the options, Stephen Drew just makes the Red Sox better.

The off-season is moving along at a brisk pace and like a pot on one of those spin-y pottery things, the 2014 Boston Red Sox are taking shape before our eyes. As Chad Finn likes to say, maybe there's a blockbuster trade to be made somewhere here, but likely the roster you see right now is the roster that will show up for workouts in Fort Myers at the end of February. There is one more likely or semi-likely addition, however. Stephen Drew. Drew is still a free agent and having turned down the Red Sox qualifying offer, another team will sacrifice their first round pick should they sign him. This makes Drew signing with another non-Boston team just slightly more difficult and makes his return to Boston just slightly more likely.

Drew's agent, Scott Boras, held his annual media scrum yesterday and not surprisingly the topic of Drew's free agency came up. Pesky reporters, what with all their questions and wanting answers and such! You might have noticed, had you been following the trade rumors this off-season, that Drew's name hasn't often come up. That was of no concern to Boras who claims Drew has several multi-year offers, contingent on plans falling into place for those other teams. That's fine. For their part, the Red Sox seem content to sit back and wait to see what happens with Drew. That's a perfectly logical way to approach the issue, but I hope that when push comes to shove Drew is back in Boston next season.

This took some thinking, because it's not exactly clean cut, but it came down to a common theme for the 2013 team: depth. The Red Sox are a much deeper team with Stephen Drew on the roster than without him. With Drew, the Red Sox have an infield of Mike Napoli, Dustin Pedroia, Drew, and probably Xander Bogaerts. Without Drew, Bogaerts moves to shortstop and Will Middlebrooks probably becomes the every day third baseman. I like Middlebrooks a lot, but after last season I'm not sure that turning the starting job over to him is what's best for the Red Sox.

Last season Drew hit .253/.333/.443, which is damn good for just about anyone these days let alone a shortstop. That's above average on-base ability, and above-average power from a good fielding shortstop. Can he repeat it? The projection systems out now aren't so sure. FanGraphs has two, Steamer and Oliver, and they both say about the same thing for both Drew (and Middlebrooks). They have Drew at about a .315 on-base and a .380 slugging percentage. I'll take the over on both of those numbers.

I think there's a strong chance Drew repeats his 2013 numbers or maybe even betters them. Maybe I'm just bullish on Drew, but if you look at what he did when he was healthy both in Arizona and last season, the 2013 numbers are the norm. Will he stay healthy? No, probably not, but it's not the nagging injuries that have hurt his overall numbers. A badly broken ankle was the culprit in 2011 and 2012. Then a concussion in Spring Training derailed his last season before it could get going. So how'd he do in April of last season? .519 OPS. He was awful. Don't think the concussion had anything to do with that, do you? From May 1 on, Drew hit .267/.342/.469. That's about what I'm expecting him to do (if healthy) in 2014. Maybe a bit worse, maybe a bit better, but roughly that. Last season, the second best hitting shortstop in baseball was our old friend Jed Lowrie who hit .290/.344/.446. So after getting over his concussion, Drew was at roughly the offensive level of the second best hitting shortstop in baseball (Tulowitzki was first, if you were wondering).

Compare that to Middlerooks, who hit .227/.271/.425 last season. There's a lot to be scared about in that slash line. But I did some cherry-picking with Drew, so let's do some for Middlebrooks too. After an awful start to the season, Middlebrooks was sent to Triple-A. When he returned, he hit .253/.307/.443, which is a much more respectable line. Can he do that over a full season? Maybe, but I have my doubts. The last month of the season Middlebrooks hit .244/.270/.477. The slugging is nice, but oh total ugh to the rest of it.

If there was a way to guarantee that Middlebrooks would hit .250/.310/.420 next season, it would probably make financial sense to let Drew go and play Middlebrooks, but of course there isn't any guarantee. Of course there isn't one for Drew either, but for one Drew offers more certainty, but if something happens and Drew falters, guess what? You've still got Middlebrooks! If Drew signs elsewhere and Middlebrooks falters, you aren't going to get Drew, or anyone even remotely i the same ballpark.

I hear what you're saying. Last year the Red Sox won with Middlebrooks' lousy play, so if Middlebrooks is bad in 2014 maybe they can win again. But last season they won because Middlebrooks was their only hole. Everyone else in the lineup was healthy (enough) and productive. I don't think you can plan on that happening again. Middlebrooks may have a good 2014 in him, but he may hit .230/.270/.420 and then what do you do? Then you've got to make a trade for a lesser player and from a position of weakness. That or bring up a prospect from the minors, possibly before they're ready to face major league pitching. That's not a situation that a team wants to find itself in, but if the Red Sox don't sign Stephen Drew it's, if not a likely outcome, than a very easily foreseen one.

Drew is Middlebrooks insurance, but he's more than that. He's a legitimate above-average hitter and fielder at a premium position. He's not flawless, certainly, but he's a guy who moves the needle closer to Championship. Middlebrooks may be that guy, but right now there's a lot of uncertainty about it, and so the question becomes, do you want to take that chance? I don't.

Next season the Blue Jays aren't likely going to be a train-wreck. The Yankees have Ellsbury and McCann and may have much more by the time the season rolls around. The Orioles are made of grit or something. The Rays have young pitchers on top of young pitchers. Defending the AL East crown let alone the World Series championship is going to be a huge challenge. The Red Sox are going to need everything going their way to win in 2014. Having Stephen Drew at shortstop makes them better offensively, better defensively, and deepens the roster. Mostly though, Drew just makes the Red Sox better. And who wouldn't want that?

Read more Red Sox:

Yankees Rumors: Henry Rodriguez, Johan Santana

$
0
0

Baseball agent Peter Greenberg met with Brian Cashman and the two discussed which clients of his the Yankees were interested in. Out of the list Cashman was given, he mentioned that he was interested in Johan Santana and Henry Rodriguez.

The Yankees are covering all bases when considering Santana, as nothing has escalated beyond a basic level of interest. If discussions become more serious, they would likely want him on a one-year incentive-laden minor league deal. Cashman states he hasn't even reviewed the lefty's medical records, which I'm sure will excite him, so absolutely nothing could happen from all this.

Cashman's interest in Rodriguez is a little perplexing. He might be just 26 years old, but the right-hander has a 4.24 ERA and 4.02 FIP over five seasons. While he does have a 9.1 K/9, he only managed a rate of 4.9 in 2013, and he has never had a walk rate under four. Unless it's a minor league deal, the Yankees shouldn't even bother. Middling righties are not where you want to go bargain hunting for a major league option, they should instead focus on trying to add lefties and backend relievers.


Yankees rumors: New York one of the likeliest destinations for Joaquin Benoit

$
0
0

The Yankees are one of the teams reportedly interested in reliever Joaquin Benoit as they look to add relievers to the bullpen.

The Yankees are looking to add arms to the bullpen, and Joaquin Benoit is one of the relievers being considered. It is believed that Benoit is most likely to end up in Cleveland, Seattle, San Diego, New York (with the Yankees), or Chicago (with the Cubs).

The 36-year-old right-hander is coming off of a 2013 season with the Tigers where he found himself taking over the role of closer from Jose Valverde in June. Over the 67 innings that Benoit pitched in 2013, he posted a 9.81 K/9, 2.96 BB/9, and a 2.87 FIP. If saves are important to you, he ended the season with 24, out of 26 chances (One of those blown saves came in the form of a David Ortiz game-tying grand slam in Game 2 of the ALCS).

It seems as though David Robertson is likely to take over the role of closer, but Benoit could possibly throw his hat into the ring, or at the very least add some needed depth to the bullpen.

Yankees rumors: Omar Infante turns down three-year offer, seeking four year/$40MM

$
0
0

Infante apparently wants a deal for four years and $40 million. Will the Yankees give it to him?

According to Jon Heyman, the Yankees offered second baseman Omar Infante a three-year deal.

The Yankees offered him a three-year, $24 million contract, which is $8 million per year. Infante did not accept the Yankees' offer, as he is looking for a four-year deal for $40 million. The Kansas City Royals are also among other baseball clubs looking to sign Infante. There's no telling what Dayton Moore might do, so the Yankees organization might very well give Infante the fourth year he's looking for, much like they did with Carlos Beltran and the third year he got.

The Yankees just recently turned down a trade from the Cincinnati Reds that would have sent Brett Gardner to the Great American Ballpark in exchange for four years of Brandon Phillips. With the recent loss of Robinson Cano, the Yankees are in need of a second baseman, unless their plan is to have Kelly Johnson play there every day.

What do you think, Yankee fans? Should the Yankees stand firm with three years or give Infante the deal he's looking for?

Sporcle Quiz: Can you name every Yankees multi-year contract since free agency began?

$
0
0

As we learned from the trivia contest during the week, the Yankees have signed 121 multi-year contracts since free agency's beginnings in the 1974-75 offseason. Can you name them all?

The 2013-14 offseason has brought the Yankees several big multi-year contracts already. It is of course nothing new for the Yankees to be reaping the free agent crop; it's a tradition that goes back to free agency's beginnings and late owner George Steinbrenner's ambitions to build the best baseball team possible through the almighty dollar. For as much as fans can criticize the Boss for his decisions on who to sign, there's no denying that his willingness to actually use the big bucks brought in by the Yankees' franchise to improve the team rather than pocket it for greater personal gain was a personality trait unique among owners. Other franchise directors were just as wealthy as Steinbrenner if not more so, but they rarely spent as fervently as him.

The Yankees' decision to lock up a few more multi-year deals this winter got me thinking about exactly how many such contracts, including extensions, they have signed throughout the nigh-40 years of free agency. That's what led me to coming up with the trivia questions from the "Baseball Blueprints" contest earlier this week. It wasn't the smoothest project since signings are not extremely well-documented or conveniently organized anywhere. I went through every single Baseball-Reference Yankees season transaction log since the end of the 1974 campaign and looked up every signing's initial news report through the Google News archives to obtain as precise details about the signings as possible (and to weed out the one-year deals).

It's complete now, and I've entered the quiz onto Sporcle here, so have it and share how you did! If you have any questions about the quiz, definitely let me know as well. Per usual with these Sporcle posts, use the spoiler tag (the little black box when discussing answers in the comments so that none of the answers are given away (I will delete comments that don't use appropriately use the tag). Enjoy!

Yankees offer Omar Infante 3 years, Royals still in

$
0
0

Yankees, Royals are vying hard for Infante's services.

The New York Yankees have made free agent second baseman Omar Infante a three-year offer, according to Jon Heyman.

While donning Pinstripes (and the winning, big-market exposure, and everything that goes with playing in New York) might be tempting, Infante is reportedly seeking a four-year deal in the $40M range.

Joel Sherman is reporting the Yankees are only willing to go up to $24M over three years:

New York has had reported interest in both Infante and Brandon Phillips as Robinson Cano alternatives as far back as early November. Now that Cano is in Seattle, the urgency to replace his production before the last available options are gone should certainly weigh on Yankees front office -- but just last night the club rejected a trade for Brandon Phillips.

Heyman also reports that the Kansas City Royals, previously reported as interested in Infante, are still in on a potential deal. After non-tendering Chris Getz last week, Kansas City has no starting second baseman, so adding Infante would appear to be a priority.

The Royals look like they're making an effort, at least:

Infante, who will turn 32-years old later this month, hit .318 with a .345 OBP, 10 home runs, 24 doubles, 51 RBI, 5 stolen bases and a .795 OPS in 2013 with the Detroit Tigers.

The long shadow of the Alex Rodriguez contract

$
0
0

There are sixth-graders around the country who have never known anything else, so what happens when you remove A-Rod from atop the list of baseball's highest-paid players?

Thirteen years ago this week, Texas owner Tom Hicks changed baseball salaries forever when he signed free-agent shortstop Alex Rodriguez to a ten-year, $252 million contract. At $25.2 million per year, A-Rod rocketed past Carlos Delgado (whose $17 million/year contract was less than two months old) to become the highest-paid player in baseball history, as measured by Annual Average Value.

Thirteen years later, he remains atop the list.

In the meantime, more than 50 players have signed contracts worth more annually than Delgado's once-record deal -- thirty of them have even passed the $20 million AAV mark! And each contract has been, at least subconsciously, compared to the A-Rod deal. It's become almost a tradition: when someone signs a big deal over the winter, we automatically compare it to the Rodriguez signing (or his subsequent raise in 2007) and say "Still not higher than A-Rod? Ho hum."

But thirteen years of using an extreme outlier as our go-to comparison is starting to warp our view on player contracts. Compared to A-Rod, for example, Jacoby Ellsbury's $21 million-a-year contract looks just as small today as it would have 6 years ago. The difference is that, today, Ellsbury has the 18th largest active contract, while six years ago it would have been the second largest, behind only Rodriguez himself. (In the same vein, Robinson Cano's $24 million-a-year contract is eighth today, but would have been third even two years ago.)

To fully understand today's rising salaries, we need to get away from the outlier that is Alex Rodriguez's contract and look at other salaries around the league. With that in mind, I've decided to do something a lot of you would love to do: Pretend like A-Rod never existed! It is time to answer the question, "Who would have held the title of highest-paid player in baseball if Alex Rodriguez wasn't in the league?"

Let's see what we find!

October 20, 2000 - Carlos Delgado, Toronto Blue Jays, $17 million (AAV) for four years
The full list of top contracts between 1980 and 2000 can be found here. Delgado signed his contract barely two months before Alex Rodriguez usurped the crown for the next decade-and-a-half. Even in this world without A-Rod, Delgado's record doesn't last for very long...

December 19, 2000 - Manny Ramirez, Boston Red Sox, $20 million AAV for eight years
Because the Red Sox had mad eyes for Manny. Not without good reason, as his track record over the next six-plus years showed. (Two months later, Derek Jeter signed the second-largest contract in history with his ten-year, $189 million extension. The $18.9 million-a-year was enough to push Delgado further down the list, but not enough to beat out Manny.)

May 31, 2006 - Roger Clemens, Houston Astros, $22 million AAV for one* year
May 6, 2007 - Roger Clemens, New York Yankees, $28 million AAV for one* year
Roger Clemens never made $28 million in a year. He did, however, get $17 million for two-thirds of a season with the Yankees. That prorates to $28 million for a full season, but it hardly seems fair to count it. I'm including the two contracts here only as an acknowledgement of their odd nature.

February 2, 2008 - Johan Santana, New York Mets, $22.9 million AAV for six years
Aside from the Clemens funny business, Manny wore the crown for a very long time. It wasn't until two-time Cy Young winner and free-agent-to-be Santana was traded to the Mets that the $20 million-a-year barrier was finally surpassed. Miguel Cabrera, in a similar deal with the Tigers, would come the closest, but even his $19 million-a-year contract was only agreed to after Santana broke the bank.

December 20, 2008 - CC Sabathia, New York Yankees, $23 million AAV for seven years
The big lefty made short work of Santana's contract when he joined the Yankees following a short stint with the Brewers in 2008.

March 21, 2010 - Joe Mauer, Minnesota Twins, $23 million AAV for eight years
Minnesota golden boy Joe Mauer didn't beat Sabathia's mark when he signed an eight-year extension following his 2009 MVP season, but he did join him atop the list.

April 27, 2010 - Ryan Howard, Philadelphia Phillies, $25 million AAV for five years
How do you count a contract extension that's still two years away in a list like this? The $25 million-a-year extension catapulted Howard to the top of this list, but not until the 2012 season. Would someone in 2010 have said that Howard was then the highest-paid player? Or would they have waited until the extension actually began?

December 15, 2010 - Cliff Lee, Philadelphia Phillies, $24 million AAV for five years
Let's keep things interesting and assume that Howard's extension doesn't count on our list until 2012. That makes Lee the next player to hold the crown with this $24 million-a-year contract. Remember, this is the contract that people were trying to claim Lee "took less money on" after spurning the Rangers.

November 1, 2011 - CC Sabathia, New York Yankees, $24.4 million AAV for five years
Utilizing a clause in his contract that gave him the power to opt out after three seasons, Sabathia was able to renegotiate his salary with the Yankees in 2011. The $24.4 million-a-year average annual value edges Lee for the top spot, but just briefly.

April 27, 2010* - Ryan Howard, Philadelphia Phillies, $25 million AAV for five years
Is there where Ryan Howard goes? Who knows.

December 15, 2012 - Josh Hamilton, Los Angeles Angels, $25 million AAV for five years
A year after signing Albert Pujols to the largest contract by total value in baseball history (non-Alex Rodriguez Division), the Angels again splurged on a free agent. Hamilton's $25 million made him the first player to match the Ryan Howard contract extension from more than two years before.

February 12, 2013 - Felix Hernandez, Seattle Mariners, $25 million AAV for seven years
King Felix became the second when the Mariners opened their checkbook for the future Hall of Famer. Still less than the average annual salary Alex Rodriguez agreed to in December 2000.

March 29, 2013 - Justin Verlander, Detroit Tigers, $25.7 million AAV for seven years
Finally! After more than 12 years (and a ten-percent pay increase in 2007), someone finally signed a contract worth more than the $25.2 million-a-year A-Rod agreed to as a 25-year-old. It only took winning the MVP and Cy Young Awards in one season! Of course, it wasn't enough for No. 1, because of A-Rod's new deal with the Yankees in 2007.

So who will be the next to find himself atop the list of highest paid non-Alex Rodriguez players in baseball? The safe bet is probably Clayton Kershaw. He's younger and better than every other pitcher on this list was at the time they signed their contracts, and he happens to play for one of the league's richest teams. And there's a distinct possibility that Kershaw will actually top A-Rod's deal. What would a few million extra matter to the Dodgers?

River Ave. to be renamed Rivera Ave. in honor of Mo

$
0
0

By the beginning of next season, Yankee Stadium's address will be East 161st Street & Rivera Avenue

On Septemeber 18th, the New York Post began campaigning that a block of River Avenue, the avenue on which Yankee Stadium is located, be renamed to Rivera Avenue in honor of retired Yankee closer Mariano Rivera. On Tuesday, the New York Post reported that the proposal to do so passed 47-0, unanimously agreeing that the new address of Yankee Stadium will be East 161st St and Rivera Ave.

"It’s an honor to have a street named after me," Rivera told The Post afterwards.

" I have a lot of great memories driving down that street. My family and I are extremely grateful for this."

The article states that Yankees fan Thomas Ferrera persuaded City Council member Maria del Carmen Arroyo to file the paperwork necessary for the change. Ms. Arroyo's district includes Yankee Stadium. Foley's NY Pub and Restaurant in Midtown Manhattan also helped to push the City Council to approve the bill by holding a petition drive. Almost three months after the Post started championing the idea, Mo will be honored with a street named after him.

According to the report, it could take up to three months before the changes are officially made. Knowing the Yankees, they may very well wait until April 7th, 2014 to unveil the change. The Yankees home opener is scheduled that day at 1:05 PM against the Baltimore Orioles. It's not hard to picture a fantastic celebration with Mariano Rivera throwing out the first pitch that afternoon after Rivera Ave. is unveiled to the public for the first time.

Let us know in the comments section what you think of River Ave. being renamed Rivera Ave. in honor of Mo.

Yankees Hot Stove: Tigers sign Joba Chamberlain

$
0
0

Will you miss him?

Yankees fans have already had to say goodbye to one disappointing prospect in Phil Hughes, when he signed with the Minnesota Twins. Now they will say goodbye to another as Joba Chamberlain has signed with the Tigers. Something tells me no one will be losing any sleep over this.

His deal is a one-year, $2.5 million contract and will be loaded with performance incentives, but it likely won't get much better than that. The former top prospect had to settle for a less-than-$1 million raise after his terrible 2013 season. The Yankees were obviously not interested in bringing him back after the laundry list of problems they had with him over his career:

  • There was the time he was arrested for a DUI.
  • He had unnecessary Tommy John surgery.
  • He broke his ankle falling off a trampoline.
  • One time he told the media he could still be a starter.
  • He yelled at Mariano Rivera.

Still, we'll always have those 24 innings in 2007 when everyone decided right there and then he was going to be the future closer, even though Mo only just retired. Maybe it was the jostling around between the bullpen and rotation, maybe it was poor development, maybe it was injury. Whatever the problem was with Joba, it all led to disappointment and the reality that, despite being only 28, he just might not be that good.

I assume he will be a reliever, but maybe the Tigers give him a look in the rotation. Hopefully he figures it out in Detroit this year, but I doubt he'll ever reach the potential we all hoped for.


The Yankees should keep Brett Gardner

$
0
0

With plenty of veterans on the roster who played the outfield in 2013, the Yankees could think Brett Gardner is more luxury than necessity. But they would be mistaken.

Almost immediately after the announcement of Carlos Beltran agreeing to become the next fancy new Yankees signing, the gears started churning in the heads of the media and fans. Thoughts went to what the Yankees could get for Brett Gardner via trade, both due to being one of the Yankees few attractive trade pieces at the major league level and being an outfielder with skills that were supposedly redundant next to new centerfielder Jacoby Ellsbury. To their credit the Yankees have said they're not shopping Gardner, but that would be a pretty normal response about any player under contract. They would be wise to not part with him since the team's outfielding situation is still far from ideal.

Considering the nature of the injuries that have befallen Jacoby Ellsbury (collisions and the like), I think it's fair to pencil him in every day in 2014 without much reservation. But aside from he and Gardner, there's nothing but question marks in the Yankees outfield. Zoilo Almonte could provide some young depth, but it's unknown if he's even a MLB-caliber talent. Vernon Wells probably should have been cut several times over already. Ichiro Suzuki provides value with his speed and defense but has fallen so far as a hitter (71 wRC+ in '13) that any role beyond pinch hitter or runner would be a mistake.

That would leave left and right field in the Gardner-less scenario to Alfonso Soriano and Carlos Beltran, who will be 38 and 37 respectively in the 2014 season. The older Soriano is the less concerning of the two as he has both managed to maintain his health and remain an adequate fielder to this point, but age is always something to be wary of. Beltran is another situation entirely. Beltran's -15.3 UZR in 2013 was fourth-worst among all qualified fielders, and with a history of injuries to his knees his fielding prowess is likely to get worse before it gets better. It would behoove the Yankees to view Beltran as more of a primary DH than an everyday outfielder not only for maintaining defensive quality but keeping Beltran as fresh as possible.

The Yankees definitely have other pressing matters with their roster, but part of making this a playoff-caliber roster is not filling one hole while opening others. As more and more rumors surface regarding Gardner, I fear the Yankees are in the process of talking themselves into the viability of an Ellsbury/Soriano/Beltran outfield in 2014 (or one involving Ichiro. Yikes.). I just don't see the risks of taking such a course outweighing the rewards. Hang on to Gardner and maintain what would be an outstanding defensive outfield. I know it's tempting to dangle one of your only trade assets, but as the roster is currently constructed this team still has both plenty of use and need for Brett Gardner. This team needs to improve, not make lateral movements.

MORE FROM PINSTRIPE ALLEY

Yankees trade rumors: Three-way trade Wednesday would have involved Gardner, Masterson, & Gregorius

$
0
0

Rumors of a three-way trade involving the Yankeessparked up Wednesday with Justin Masterson of the Indians and Brett Gardner being speculated as two of the pieces. Indians manager Terry Francona told Masterson he wasn't being traded and Brian Cashman made it clear that he wasn't actively shopping Gardner. A trade proposal from the Cincinnati Reds that would have involved a swap of Gardner and Brandon Phillips was rejected by the Yankees late Wednesday night. A day after all that crazy went down, more details about the three-way trade that wasn't are coming out.

According to Sweeny Murti of WFAN, the three-team trade would have sent Gardner to Cleveland, Justin Masterson to the Arizona Diamondbacks, and shortstop Didi Gregorius, who would have been moved to second base for the time being, to New York. Gregorius would have helped to fill the void left by Robinson Cano at second base while allowing the Yankees to deal from one of their few places of strength, the outfield.

Cashman seems adamant about holding onto Gardner unless he can get solid starting pitching in return, or at least something more than adequate to fill the hole in the infield. It seems as though the Yankees have no qualms about starting 2014 with both Gardner and Jacoby Ellsbury in the outfield, but are at least willing to listen in case the right deal comes along for impending free agent Gardner. Judging by the comments Francona made yesterday, the hold up on this deal may have very well been on the part of the Indians and not the Yankees.

The Winter Meetings come to a close in Orlando today, but that certainly doesn't mark the end of the trading process. Other teams know what the Yankees need and that Gardner is one of the few major league proven pieces they have with which to make a trade. It may all come down to whether or not another team needs Gardner enough to part with an enticing player for the Yankees, or if the front office decides to go with an okay deal instead of a great one.

Yankees history: MVP award history part two

$
0
0

A Yankee has been named the AL MVP 22 times since the award's inception. Here's a look at the seven winners between 1947 and 1957.

In the first part of this series we took a look at the first seven times a Yankee won the MVP award. Let's move right along and take a look at the next seven. All data courtesy of Baseball Reference.

Joe DiMaggio in 1947: .315/.391/.522, 20 HR, 97 RBI, 154 OPS+, 4.8 WAR

After a three-year World Series drought, the Yankees triumphantly returned in 1947. DiMaggio was a key contributor and won his final MVP award in what was a mundane season by his standards. If you rank his seasons by WAR, this was his 10th best out of 13.

Who should have won: DiMaggio somehow beat out his nemesis Ted Williams by a single vote to win this one but probably should not have even been on the ballot. The Splendid Splinter once again took the league by storm, leading the AL in all three slash stats, home runs, runs batted in, runs scored, and total bases. He more than doubled DiMaggio's WAR total.

Phil Rizzuto in 1950: .324/.418/.439, 7 HR, 66 RBI, 122 OPS+, 6.7 WAR

This was the second of five consecutive championships for the Yankees, and it was powered by a career season from Rizzuto. He set career highs in nearly every offensive category and continued to field shortstop better than any of his contemporaries.

Who should have won: St. Louis Browns starting pitcher Ned Garver actually led the league in WAR despite having a losing record, but the Scooter was tops among position players. He just barely edged out Cleveland's Larry Doby, who put up flashier offensive numbers for a 92-win team. Holy Cow, Phil Rizzuto really did deserve this one.

Yogi Berra in 1951: .294/.350.492, 27 HR, 88 RBI, 130 OPS+, 4.7 WAR

Yogi won his first MVP award amid the Yankees greatest run of success. He proved to be the best player on a team full of very good ones and was beginning to stake his claim as one of the best catchers in baseball history. His quotability certainly didn't hurt his cause either.

Who should have won: This might sound familiar, but Ted Williams led the AL in all three slash stats again. He also led the league in WAR, outperforming Berra by 2.5 wins. That now makes four MVPs that Williams probably should have won over a Yankee player, and he didn't get a single first place vote here. Sportswriters of the era had a serious problem with the guy.

Yogi Berra in 1954: .307/.367/.488, 22 HR, 125 RBI, 136 OPS+, 5.3 WAR

The Yankees snapped their streak of five World Series wins in a row, though they won 103 games. Berra was still in his prime and had another fine season. He and a strapping young player named Mickey Mantle spearheaded the AL's best offense.

Who should have won: The Mick had a better season than Berra by a fair margin. He was worth about a win and a half more than Yogi but the voters weren't ready to christen Joe DiMaggio's successor as MVP just yet. Minnie Minoso of the White Sox was probably the best choice for MVP though. In the best season of his career he led the league in total bases and put up 8,3 WAR.

Yogi Berra in 1955: .272/.349/.470, 27 HR, 108 RBI, 120 OPS+, 4.5 WAR

In their return to the World Series, the Yankees finally lost one to the bums from Brooklyn. Yogi went back-to-back for his third and final MVP. At age 30, he proved to be remarkably durable behind the plate as he strapped on the tools of ignorance in 145 games for the third time in his career.

Who should have won: This was the least impressive of Berra's MVP awards. He wasn't even in the top 10 of the league in terms of WAR but he had three teammates that were. The best of the trio was Mantle again, who had his first of many all-time great seasons. He led the AL in home runs, walks, on base percentage, and slugging percentage on his way to 9.5 WAR, more than doubling Berra's total.

Mickey Mantle in 1956: .353/.464/.705, 52 HR, 130 RBI, 210 OPS+, 11.3 WAR

The Bombers avenged their World Series loss to the Dodgers and The Mick finally got his due. He cemented his superstar status by winning the Triple Crown and unanimously taking home MVP honors.

Who should have won: Nobody could touch Mantle in 1956. He was worth a full three wins more than his closest competition in the AL and the gap was even larger when compared to NL players. As if he needed a cherry on top, he also made a ridiculous catch in center field on a ball scorched by Gil Hodges to preserve Don Larsen's perfect game during the Fall Classic.

Mickey Mantle in 1957: .365/.512/.665, 34 HR, 94 RBI, 221 OPS+, 11.3 WAR

Hank Aaron and the Milwaukee Braves derailed the Yankees' bid for back-to-back championships, but it was through no fault of Mantle. He matched the brilliance of his 1956 season despite hitting 18 fewer home runs. He made up for that by drawing a career-high 146 walks.

Who should have won: Mantle certainly earned his repeat win but it wasn't as easy this time around. The vote was far from unanimous and his stiffest competition came from our old friend Ted Williams. Amazingly, at 38 years old The Kid was still a dominant offensive force. He led the league in all three slash stats and was worth nearly 10 wins despite being a liability in left field.

Around the Empire: New York Yankees News - 12/13/13

$
0
0

Last Time on Pinstripe Alley


  • Yankees history: MVP award history part two
  • Yankees trade rumors: Three-way trade Wednesday would have involved Gardner, Masterson, & Gregorius
  • The Yankees should keep Brett Gardner
  • Yankees Hot Stove: Tigers sign Joba Chamberlain
  • River Ave. to be renamed Rivera Ave. in honor of Mo
  • Sporcle Quiz: Can you name every Yankees multi-year contract since free agency began?
  • Yankees rumors: Omar Infante turns down three-year offer, seeking four year/$40MM
  • Yankees rumors: New York one of the likeliest destinations for Joaquin Benoit
  • Yankees Rumors: Henry Rodriguez, Johan Santana
  • Yankees Prospects: Tom Kahnle, Ravel Santana, Mikey O'Brien taken in the Rule 5 Draft
  • Yankees Top Moments: (#4) Derek Jeter's 3,000th hit vs (#5) Luis Sojo's World Series winning single
  • Yankees Prospects: Rule 5 Draft
  • Yankees News

    First round results for the Pinstripe Alley Top Moments Tournament

    $
    0
    0

    Each of the four brackets' first round matchups are complete! Which moments moved on to the second round as the top 16 moments in Yankees history?

    Over the past month, we've revisited 32 fantastic Yankees moments for the Top Moments Tournament, but only 16 can move on to the next round. Here are the first round results and the eight second round matchups:

    Founding-1959

    (1) Gehrig's "Luckiest Man" speech: 94%
    (8) Henrich's strikeout-turned win in the '41 World Series: 6%


    (2) Larsen's perfecto: 94%
    (7) Gehrig's four-homer game: 6%


    (3) Ruth's "Called Shot": 69%
    (6) Martin's walk-off single in '53 clinches record fifth title in a row: 31%


    (4) DiMaggio's hit streak reaches 56: 76%
    (5) Ruth hits his 60th homer: 24%

    1960-79

    (1) Maris hits his 61st homer: 85%
    (8) Mantle homer ends '64 World Series Game 3: 15%

    (2) Chambliss blast ends ALCS: 61%
    (7) Yanks and Murcer win one for Munson: 39%


    (3) Bucky F'in Dent: 92%
    (6) Line out ends '62 World Series Game 7: 8%


    (4) Reggie homers thrice in '77 World Series Game 6: 75%
    (5) Guidry fans 18 Angels: 25%

    1980-99

    (1) Cone's perfecto: 75%
    (8) Abbott's one-handed no-hitter: 25%


    (2) Wells's perfecto: 61%
    (7) Mattingly's first playoff homer: 39%


    (3) Leyritz homer ties '96 World Series Game 6: 75%
    (6) The Jeffrey Maier homer: 25%


    (4) Tino's '98 World Series slam: 64%
    (5) Righetti's July 4th no-hitter: 36%

    2000-present

    (1) Aaron Boone: 82%
    (8) Jeter dives into stands: 18%


    (2) Late-game '01 World Series heroics: 67%
    (7) A-Rod owns Nathan in the '09 ALDS: 33%


    (3) Jeter's Flip Play: 66%
    (6) Mo's last game: 34%


    (4) DJ3K: 60%
    (5) Sojo wins the Subway Series: 40%

    Second round

    Founding-1959

    (1) Gehrig's "Luckiest Man" speech vs. (4) DiMaggio's hit streak reaches 56
    (2) Larsen's perfecto vs. (3) Ruth's "Called Shot"

    1960-79

    (1) Maris hits his 61st homer vs. (4) Reggie homers thrice in '77 World Series Game 6
    (2) Chambliss blast ends ALCS vs. (3) Bucky F'in Dent

    1980-99

    (1) Cone's perfecto vs. (4) Tino's '98 World Series slam
    (2) Wells's perfecto vs. (3) Leyritz homer ties '96 World Series Game 6

    2000-present

    (1) Aaron Boone vs. (4) DJ3K
    (2) Late-game '01 World Series heroics vs. (3) Jeter's Flip Play

    Top_moments_medium
    Click to embiggen

    ***

    So basically, every moment that was a seeder seed advanced. Sorry, underdogs. I'll just take this to mean that we did a pretty good job assigning seeds. I predict that the second round will get a little bit more interesting though, as good arguments could be made for almost every moment left that it should have been a number one seed. Are you surprised by any of the results? Which moment do you think is the favorite to finish #1?

    Tanya and I will be rolling out the second rounds posts next week. Thanks for participating and keep it up!

    Viewing all 4714 articles
    Browse latest View live




    Latest Images